Casual Accusations of Treason

Putz occasionally says he doesn't endorse everything to which he links. So does he agree with this statement?

But somehow, the New York Times and the other enablers of the enemy in what is fundamentally an information war, can't be bothered to point that out, or point out the differences, instead descending into hand wringing and moral equivalence, in an apparent effort to cast doubt on the goodness of our own society and values, and even whether or not they're worth defending.

Does Putz believe, as Rand Simberg (who didn't get the memo) seems to, that The New York Times is guilty of treason? If he doesn't, he should say so.

Silence is complicity, you know.