Friday, February 17, 2012

Glenn Reynolds: Occupy is full of "Filthy and Disheveled" Anti-Semites

It's amazing the WSJ prints this shit.
Bourgeois vs. Non-Bourgeois Revolutions: A Comparison and Contrast. The Occupy movement left its major sites—McPherson Square in D.C., Zuccotti Park in Manhattan, Dewey Square in Boston—filthy and disheveled. By contrast, the tea party protests famously left the Washington Mall and other locations cleaner than they found them, with members proudly performing cleanup duties.
The dirty hippie, updated for the 21st century!

Scapegoating and anti-Semitism in mass economic-protest movements. The Occupy movement began as an assault on "the 1%," a shadowy elite of bankers and financiers charged with running the world for their own benefit. Within a few months, the Anti-Defamation League was noting that anti-Semitic statements and sympathies seemed surprisingly widespread within the Occupy encampments. Compare with other such movements that led to similar results. Are such developments inevitable? If so, what strands in Western (and perhaps non-Western) culture account for this?
Gosh, I don't remember any racist signs at Teabagger rallies or racist remarks and emails by prominent Teabagger leaders, do you?

Are such developments inevitable? What could account for this?

What a Putz.

No comments: