Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Kay Graham Would Not Be Pleased.

A while back, Sally Quinn made the Catholic League's Bill Donohue very angry . Was Donohue's "On Faith" piece yesterday -- in which he blamed homosexuals and atheists for the fall of western civilization -- part of a kiss-and-make-up quid pro quo?

I really hope so, because otherwise I might just question the Post's editorial judgment, which is historically impeccable.

Here, friends, are a few sentences The Washington Post has seen fit to legitimize:

-- "Sexual libertines, from the Marquis de Sade to radical gay activists, have sought to pervert society by acting out on their own perversions. What motivates them most of all is a pathological hatred of Christianity."

-- "From banning nativity scenes to punishing little kids for painting a picture of Jesus, the zealots [the ACLU] give Fidel a good run for his money."

-- "Catholics were once the mainstay of the Democratic Party; now the gay activists are in charge."

-- "The culture war is up for grabs. The good news is that religious conservatives continue to breed like rabbits, while secular saboteurs have shut down: they're too busy walking their dogs, going to bathhouses and aborting their kids."

Feel free to write Jon Meacham, one of folks responsible for the section, here. Be nice.

Or not.

No comments: