Since when is 2% of the budget "lame"? When it's Obama scrutinizng it.

Putz obviously doesn't read the NY Times, because if he did, he wouldn't ask stupid questions like this. Krugman, for those who've been paying attention, has been extremely critical/skeptical of Obama's economic policies from the start.

Also, someone who obsesses about earmarks -- which comprise about 2-3% of the budget -- to the degree that he posts this cute little piggie over and over for several years and touts Porkbusters as the greatest political advocacy ever (pre-Teabagging) probably shouldn't be throwing around words like "lame."