Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Alleged?

All you need to know about the editorial linked by Putz -- which purports to be about the lack of civility in politics -- is that it includes the phrase "alleged transgressions of the Bush White House."

Yeah, alleged. As if, you know, none of this happened.

Oh, and about this, this fatuous twaddle:

Clinton’s accusers remained in a constant lather for nearly two years at the end of his second term, blaming the former leader of the free world for everything from the moral decay of all of Western society to bombing foreign nations for political diversion. Clinton was demonized by a right wing that could see no good in any of his words or actions.

[snip]

Now, a similar set of circumstances has befallen Bush, with haters of the president refusing to give his administration any kind of credit or quarter.


I'm going to give Putz the benefit of the doubt and presume he doesn't actually believe this.

No comments: