After careful consideration, Putz is skeptical of Johns Hopkins study.

Not surprisingly, Putz pooh-poohs the recent study on Iraqi casualties.

A NEW LANCET STUDY ON IRAQI CASUALTIES: I'm skeptical, given their past track record.

The Lancet is a British Medical Journal. But what Putz doesn't mention is that the source of the study published in the Lancet is from those hackish amateurs at Johns Hopkins University. Not exactly Code Pink.

He then links to a bunch of war supporters/Bushbots, who are, surprise!, also skeptical about any news that refutes their Great Success in Iraq Story. The links include this piece of stupid:

"It is a larger number than were killed in Germany during five years (and 955,044 tons) of WWII bombing."

Hilarious. The scientific and statistical analysis conducted at Johns Hopkins can't be true! It's a larger number than died in the Plague of Thebes!

What a bunch of clowns.